![]() M’Intosh (1823), which established the European doctrine of discovery as the law of the land, officially codifying white supremacy. ![]() Key precedent decisions in the history of Indian law include Johnson v. Oklahoma is a key case in the history of Muscogee (Creek) Nation tribal sovereignty and may become a precedent for upholding sovereignty for many tribal nations along the Lewis and Clark Trail and beyond. The July 9th, 2020, Supreme Court ruling on McGirt v. It is an essential aspect of tribal treaty rights.Ĭourt decisions have created opportunities for the expansion of tribal sovereignty. Tribal sovereignty is a central concern for Indigenous tribes and peoples. The lessons in this unit provide a variety of learning experiences including community discussions, journal writing, creative arts pieces, presentations, video and audio files, and other activities designed to engage students on a more than perfunctory level. This type of framework incorporates learning about “place” using physical and cognitive activities that focus on our visual, auditory, tactile, spatial, smell/taste, movement/gestural, linguistic, and spiritual abilities. The Honoring Tribal Legacies curriculum follows a place-based multiliteracies design approach. This unit has relevance for tribal nations along the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail (and beyond), because many tribes have experienced both Removal and the making of treaties, and all tribal nations assert their rights to self-governance. Their task will be to anticipate and design arguments based on different views of the Supreme Court decision. Students will participate in a debate, incorporating their research from the entire unit into a project. The sixth, and last, lesson plan is a summative project. The students will research differing viewpoints of the case, tracking them through legal channels. Each assignment is an exploration of a primary source. Lesson Plans 4 and 5 are assembled to repeat similar exercises, giving students the opportunity to build on previous learning. The fifth lesson plan is based on an excerpt from the Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. The statement by the nation is a critical frame for the unit as a whole, providing insight into Indigenous legal sovereignty from the perspective of one tribal nation, but with ramifications for considerations of sovereignty for all tribes in the United States. The fourth lesson plan centers on the Muscogee (Creek) government’s response to the Supreme Court decision. An assignment based on the podcast, This Land, gives students the opportunity to explore a critical Indigenous perspective to the Supreme Court cases. The third lesson plan asks the students to examine two Supreme Court decisions, Sharp v. The 1866 Muscogee (Creek) Treaty is a primary document that was foundational to the tribe’s reservation lands and subsequent legal battles in the Supreme Court. Treaty-making as a practice will be discussed from an Indigenous perspective. Students will create an in-depth analysis of the 1866 treaty. The second lesson plan is an exploration of the post-Civil War, 1866 Muscogee (Creek) Treaty with the United States. Oklahoma legal conflict in historical context. Students will learn about the Removal Era (1812) through map comparison, placing the McGirt v. These journals are a collection of assignments that students will use to build a case for their final project structured as a debate. ![]() This lesson features the first of several online, mini-research projects that students will complete for their journals. ![]() The first lesson plan is an introduction. Oklahoma (2020), which recognizes much of the eastern portion of the state of Oklahoma to be Native American territory. This unit explores the intersections of history, treaties, and law at the center of the highly significant Supreme Court decision on McGirt v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |